Newsletter Insights — advertising rates and audience data for 23K+ newsletters
Browse all →Track Strange Loop Canon's growth
Get notified when subscribers, engagement, or pricing changes
Platform Portability
Uses custom domain (strangeloopcanon.com) — can migrate to any platform without losing subscribers
Are you a newsletter creator? Get verified insights →
“Any fool can know. The point is to understand.” ― Albert Einstein.
Data updated 2 weeks ago
Everything Is Amazing
31K subs
Where are the numbers? by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil
20K subs
Cremieux Recueil
33K subs
Avg Comments
21.0
Avg Likes
59.0
Engagement Rate
0.32%· ~80 likes + comments/post
(comments + likes) / subscribers
Reckoning with Jason Herbert
43K subscribers
Quality Score
Engagement vs Science
0.32% engagement rate
Score Breakdown
Engagement Score
| Public |
| Public |
| Public |
| Public |
| Public |
| Public |
| Public |
| Public |
| Public |
Weekly Growth
~0%
Track CPM rates as they change
Category benchmarks and audience-size adjusted rates
Start tracking — freeJoin thousands of newsletter operators tracking the market
Tracking started recently for Strange Loop Canon (11 days ago). A growth trend will appear once we have more data points.
vs 142 newsletters in Science
25K places you in the top 10% of newsletters in this category.
Engagement Rate
0.32%
median: 0.00%
Posts per Week
0.5
median: 0.9
Publishing Consistency
62/100
median: 64/100
Subscribers
25K
median: 2K
Here's what we know about this newsletter's activity:
Publishing Pace
Bi-weekly
Consistent
Category Rank
#20 of 247
in Science
Engagement Trend
Consistent
based on recent posts
Publishing Frequency
Bi-weekly
Last published Mar 21, 2026
0.5 posts/week avg
Science Pricing
$9.57/mo avg
Your newsletter: Free
Monetization Readiness
Science newsletters typically start charging at ~2K subscribers
Above the typical threshold
100% of similar-size Science newsletters have paid tiers
Track changes to monetization & ad rate insights over time
Start tracking — freeReady for Sponsors
25.0K subscribers and 0.32% engagement — past the threshold where Science newsletters typically attract sponsors.